![]() Or are the best code editors for OS X free in 2021? Github built a powerful free editor called Atom before Microsoft bought Github. It’s cramped but less distracting than the two tier version.īefore I drop another $40 into BareBones’ coffers, I’d like to know what I’m missing out on and if there’s a better code editor in which to invest. Superficially, the two applications look almost identical, along with the menus but two tier title bar has been reduced to a single bar. ![]() I don’t much use the Markup menu to write HTML any more as I usually write in Markdown and when I’m not writing Markdown I know my HTML commands well enough to write the tags outright myself. Syntax highlighting, SFTP mode, multifile search, diff all work great for me with Regex lurking in the background as a new temptation. I’m happy with how v11 works and not missing much. As I’m currently running v11.1.4 it’s time to consider upgrading. But the manual wants to make sure that long-time customers (I believe it was on Version 4 when I first bought it) don’t get confused by changes in behavior, even when those changes occurred nearly two decades ago.My long time main code editor BBEdit just updated to version 14. As I was looking up the notation for named groups in the BBEdit manual, I ran across this note:īBEdit is currently on Version 12.5 Version 6.5 came out in 2001. When a well-documented app has such a long history, the manual starts to accumulate delightful callbacks to the olden days. My general feeling is that if the pattern is so complicated I have to use variables to keep track of all the groups, I should stop and break the problem down into smaller parts.īy the way, you may have heard that BBEdit is celebrating its 25th anniversary of not sucking. ![]() I don’t think I’ve ever used a named group in any situation, whether the regex was in a text editor or a script. Here’s how that would have looked, using var as the pattern name: So after undoing the replacement, I changed the pattern to this, In other words, if I had been trying to change a10, v10, and x10 to az, vz, and xz, a replacement pattern of \1z would have been just fine, because the trailing z means there’s no way to misinterpret the intent of the \1 in that pattern. But in most cases, we can use \1 through \9 instead of \01 through \09 because there’s no ambiguity. You see, BBEdit can capture up to 99 groups in the search pattern and, strictly speaking, we should use two-digit numbers when referring to them in the replacement pattern. Since captured group 13 was blank, all my variable names were replaced with 0. Had I done so, I would have seen that BBEdit was interpreting my replacement pattern as “Captured group 13, followed by 0” instead of “Captured group 1, followed by 30,” which was what I intended. But I wasn’t clever enough to notice the blue coloring in the replacement pattern. And because I think I’m clever, I didn’t want to do three non-regex replacements, one each for a10, v10, and x10. I couldn’t just replace 10 with 30 because there were instances of 10 in the code that weren’t related to the variables. I brought up BBEdit’s Find window and entered this: ![]() The variables were named a10, v10, and x10, and I wanted to change them to a30, v30, and x30, respectively. I thought it would be a simple regex find/replace, and it was. Next post Previous post Regex groups and numeralsĪ week or so ago, I was editing a program and decided I should change some variable names.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |